Federal appeals court weighs Saudi immunity in September 11 lawsuit
Published 14h ago · Latest report 10h ago
Federal appeals judges are weighing whether Saudi Arabia can be sued by 9/11 victims' families.
Victims' families and Saudi government representatives faced off in a New York federal appeals court regarding a long-running lawsuit alleging state support for the September 11 attacks. The panel of judges did not indicate when or how they intend to rule on the kingdom's request for sovereign immunity. Saudi Arabia has consistently denied any involvement in the terrorist plot.
- The legal argumentLawyers for the families argue that the government of Saudi Arabia provided logistical assistance to several of the hijackers before the attacks.
- The judicial settingThree federal appeals judges in New York City heard the oral arguments while family members of the victims filled the courtroom gallery.
Why it matters
Families of people killed in the September 11 attacks have spent years pursuing legal accountability from foreign entities they believe aided the hijackers. Sovereign immunity laws generally protect foreign governments from lawsuits in United States courts, making these appellate hearings crucial for determining whether the litigation can legally continue.
What outlets agree on
Federal appeals judges in New York heard arguments over whether Saudi Arabia can be dismissed from a 9/11 victims' lawsuit based on sovereign immunity, without revealing how they will rule.
In this story
Covered by 2 outlets
50% of the sources are Left
Lean ratings via Ad Fontes Media, AllSides
- BBC NewsNew York court hears arguments in ongoing 9/11 families' lawsuit against Saudi Arabia10h ago · open ↗
- The Independent9/11 families flood New York court seeking justice over alleged Saudi plotters: ‘I’m still angry’13h ago · open ↗
Similar stories
What people are saying
Opens a search on that site in a new tab. Posts there are not ours and are not checked.
The headline, summary and key points are AI-generated from the sources above.




Comments